Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Final project discussion
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Video?
Monday, October 5, 2009
Reaction to One in Eight Million
I have decided to write about the piece in which the woman adopts the animals. I think that the way the story is presented in the beginning does a great job of mirroring just how simple a story it initially is. They are building up this woman’s desire to have a dog, which is nothing out of the ordinary, so I felt that the black and white stills kept the story from trying to be something that it clearly wasn’t. As the story progresses and you come to find that this woman has been generous enough to adopt as many dogs as she has, the black and white stills are a good backdrop and are tremendous in contrast with all that she has done. There are ultimately some major pros and cons to the overall layout of the story, but as a whole I thought that it was well-done.
If I had to choose my favorite part of the story, it would have to be when she was discussing her selfless nature and how she can’t just look at a disadvantaged animal and walk away. She says something about always wanting to grab for the bird with the broken wings, and just as she says it, a picture of a feather on the ground is shown. For some reason I thought that it was interesting that they elected to represent the wing itself rather than the bird. If the pictures had shown the disadvantages of all of the other animals, it undoubtedly would have been a much stronger piece. This brings me to the biggest problem I had with the story.
The story of Tilly, the dog that only had one eye and was struggling to do basic things like crossing the street, could have been handled much better in my opinion. Here is this woman, talking about a poor dog zig-zagging all over the street and nearly getting killed due to an inability to see, and all they are showing are regular-looking, side-profile views of this dog. Where is the zoomed-in picture of this dog’s face? This dog is in a rare situation that we most likely haven’t seen before, so put the camera to use! I feel that in order for these stories to be effective, the reader/viewer should be able to almost follow along without the narration. The pictures are tremendous in other areas of the story, but this was a heart-wrenching part that really could have been moving if it had the accompanying pictures.
Professor Marsters mentioned on his blog that the pictures are left in their rawest of states, in black and white and without anything really done to them. I think that the openness and honestly of the pieces almost requires the pictures to be the same, which they definitely are.